When writing a follow-up story, which device reminds the reader of previously reported facts?

In the context of writing a follow-up story, the device known as a tie-back serves to reconnect readers with previously reported facts. This is particularly important in journalism and storytelling, as it helps maintain continuity and context for the audience. By incorporating a tie-back, the writer can succinctly remind readers of crucial elements from earlier reports, ensuring that they have the necessary background information to understand the new developments. This technique reinforces the narrative arc and enhances the coherence of the story, allowing for a more engaging and understandable presentation of information.

The other devices, while they serve specific purposes in storytelling and journalism, do not fulfill the same role as a tie-back. Flashbacks might provide background details or context but operate in a different narrative structure. References could suggest mentioning past details but lack the specific function of directly connecting elements to maintain continuity. Lastly, subtitles can organize content and enhance clarity but do not serve to remind readers of prior facts in the same direct manner as a tie-back does. Thus, a tie-back is the ideal tool for referencing previous information effectively in a follow-up story.